movement

Suby from Milton Keynes, United Kingdom

Okay I am starting to get the feel this blur and overexposure of the shots are intentional. Can you explain why, cause me curious.

Suby

10 Dec 2006 7:28am

jennie.dot from Canada

Ella Darling!

You know you have it! You don't need anyones feedback...they are marvelous, as are the black and white break beat dancers...where are those on the site by the way?
I love the "close-ups" of Brodie and Jasmine leaning sideways against the wall...don't change a thing...gorgeous!
My only constructive comments: I really like to see the whole body of the dancer. I find when parts of them aren't in the photo, the fluidity expressed in the their dance moves and their faces is immediately halted as is the flow of the photo. What I mean is...in photo 24 and 40 I would love to see the rest of the beautiful line of the extension of their arms and hands. Also in photo 18 I would really like to see Karen's right foot...it looks strange like it does not exist. I wouldn't change a thing about the angle because the large sky and looking up at them is PERFECT! Perhaps they could step forward down the hill towards you so no parts of them are obscured. That's just my two cents!
My fav by FAR: Numero 17. The colour, the movement, the lighting, the dance positions...the spoons in mid-air! Magnifique!

11 Dec 2006 10:18pm

from

PREVIEW ONLY